Julie Lipke
My feedback
128 results found
-
13 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJulie Lipke
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea to the Ideas Portal.
This is the platform for Skyward users to show support for ideas they like. It’s also the perfect place to share your thoughts and start a conversation about the idea.
If you like this idea, and you want it considered for development, then we need to see your support!
If you like this idea, please vote and comment. You can track it as it rises to the top of the list.
Thank you,
Ashley Prinsen
Product OwnerAn error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Julie Lipke
commented
I agree fully-the same thing has happened to me where I didn't realize it just entered the bank with the closest routing number!!!
Julie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Good Morning! Thanks for all the feedback, we appreciate it! There is a great option right now to get to the Check Estimator from Employee Profile. If you login to Skyward > Web Human Resources > Employee Profile and search for the employee you are looking to run the Check Estimator for, you can then click on the Blue Information Icon (i) next to the search bar and Ranges button. This will take you out to Employee Access, where you can click on the Check Estimator tab and run the Check Estimator process for that employee.
An error occurred while saving the comment Julie Lipke
commented
I would also appreciate this. We have to give employes an idea of what their checks will be if they are off for an unpaid leave. Right now we have to log in as the employee to do this for them. Please give the option for us in payroll to do this without logging in as the employee.
Julie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
This functionality already exists in Skyward. If an employee submits their time sheets from web, mobile, and reader when an unapproved time off request is out there for that week validation exists to prevent the user from submitting the time sheet.
There is also validation when the time sheet is being approved to catch any unapproved time off requests at that point.
Is the situation that the time off requests are being put in after the time sheet has been submitted/approved?
Thank you!
Julie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julie Lipke
commented
Great idea! I too would like to see the option to print a range.
It would be very very helpful to be able to print the actual deposits for employees without having to log in as them.Julie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for submitting this ideas request.
We definitely could have gotten in front of this better that these buttons were going to be taken away and we will make sure next time we decide to take any buttons away for data integrity and efficiency, we will make sure we inform our valued customers way ahead of time.
The reason we committed to this enhancement is because Employee Management is no longer supported in PaC. The system did not handle the new salary calculation method and new scenarios correctly such as additional pay codes and add-ons, which ultimately could have shown inaccurate data for employees.
There are many efficiencies to using the web. Example: currently if you are running payroll or running a report and want to look at assignment information in PaC you would have to back all the way out of what you were doing to go to…
Julie Lipke
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesJulie Lipke
shared this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Julie Lipke
commented
It would be very helpful to be able to sort and/or filter unapproved time off entries by date. This would allow us to see if any need immediate approval so those time off entries can be included on the current payroll cycle.
-
1 voteJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
Julie Lipke
shared this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We’ve completed research and team analysis. We’ve decided not to pursue this request in the near future because of the data integrity ramifications of deleting historical records.
This Idea will remain available for continued voting and commenting.
Thank you!
Julie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJulie Lipke
supported this idea
·
Very important-so odd how it just chooses a number closest instead of giving a warning.