Diane Austin
My feedback
63 results found
-
7 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We’d love to see more support from the Skyward user community before considering it for development.
Thank you!
Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for submitting this Product Idea.
Can you help me understand this idea better?
Which specific fields from Position Control would you expect to pull in Data Mining?
Are there differences in the fields you would expect depending on whether you come from Employee Management or from Salary Negotiations?
Thank you!
Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. It’s not currently being considered for development. This idea will remain open for continued voting and commenting by our Skyward user community.
Thank you!
Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
Thank you for submitting and voting on this Idea. We’ve spent some time here at Skyward doing research for this request and have determined after a thorough analysis that we will not be pursing this development.
We discovered, that if we add multiple buildings to the employee profile, this change would create large ramifications. Building is found in many places throughout the system and the effort, impact and risk to update is not something we will be able to address at this time.
We recommend using Employee Management Data Mining to report on Employees and all their Assigned Buildings.
In Data Mining use Assignment as the Driver Table, In Field Areas select Position, and under Position select Position Building Code, Position Building state, and Position Building Desc. To report on all buildings associated with an Employee.
Thank you!
Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We need your feedback!
Could you detail which fields specifically you’d expect to see on the browse?
Would up to 4 accounts be adequate, or would you expect to see more than 4 accounts?
Thank you!
Diane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDiane Austin
supported this idea
·
We sincerely dislike (trying not to use 'hate') this lock/unlock feature. If it truly needs to be part of the system functionality, please make it an optional configuration feature for districts. We would definitely have it set to 'OFF'. We too have multiple people in HR needing to edit the Org Chart at one time. This is not a feasible "feature" for larger districts.
Thank you