Nicole Mast
My feedback
15 results found
-
3 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for submitting the product idea!
We are looking for more input from our users on this topic.
1. How does this affect your day to day duties with using an onboarding module?
2. What system/process do you currently use to work with gathering this payroll information? Do you utilize something like Custom Forms, FastTrack?
3. What features/processes are you looking for with this onboarding module (ie. do employees upload the documentation, review/approval process, profile integration, etc...)
This idea will remain open for further exploration and input from the Skyward Community.
Thank you!
Erik O.
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesNicole Mast
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesNicole Mast
shared this idea
·
-
105 votes
Thank you for submitting and voting on this Idea. We’ve spent some time here at Skyward doing research for this request and have determined after a thorough analysis that we will not be pursing this development.
We discovered, that if we add multiple buildings to the employee profile, this change would create large ramifications. Building is found in many places throughout the system and the effort, impact and risk to update is not something we will be able to address at this time.
We recommend using Employee Management Data Mining to report on Employees and all their Assigned Buildings.
In Data Mining use Assignment as the Driver Table, In Field Areas select Position, and under Position select Position Building Code, Position Building state, and Position Building Desc. To report on all buildings associated with an Employee.
Thank you!
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
83 votes
Thank you for this idea request and participating in voting.
We suggest using the “Force Widget Suggestions” This process will re-suggest the widget to all users that are currently not using the widget.
While this option will not force widgets on users, there are technical difficulties that would delay this enhancement. We are taking this request into consideration and working on a Qmlativ solution. At this time we will no longer be considering this enhancement for SMS 2.0.
Thank you!
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesNicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We need your feedback to clarify this request.
Is this request to make it so the pay record “by default” uses the paid start/stop dates on the CONTRACT to stop paying the pay record whether or not they’ve imported paid start/stop dates into their pay records with the assignment export/payroll import?
If you have additional information to help clarify what you’d like to see updated or expect to see changed that will help us.
Thank you!
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea! We’re researching.
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Starting with the 05.20.02.00.11 & 05.20.06.00.02 addendums both available on 6/25/2020 a new option will be available to populate the IRS Form 941 with data from the 941 Report/Extract. Presently, this is only available for the current (2020) form year.
Thank you!
Nicole Mast
supported this idea
·
