Lora Holman
My feedback
116 results found
-
7 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Thank you for submitting the product idea!
We currently have PR 5398430 created to address this change. Keep an eye out for updates on this in the near future!
Thank you!
Erik O.
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Thank you for submitting this Product Idea. We have reviewed it and would like to see more support from the Skyward user community.
There are a few questions which we would like a better understanding on with this product idea:
1. Would a user preferences area be helpful so the user can decide how they want the option defaulted on how to update assignments?
2. Are you only looking for when FTE is changed or when any area on the position control is changed?
This Idea will remain open for the Skyward user community to show support by voting and commenting on it with additional use cases.
Thank you!
An error occurred while saving the comment Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for submitting the product idea!
We are looking for more input from our users on this topic.
1. How does this affect your day to day duties with using an onboarding module?
2. What system/process do you currently use to work with gathering this payroll information? Do you utilize something like Custom Forms, FastTrack?
3. What features/processes are you looking for with this onboarding module (ie. do employees upload the documentation, review/approval process, profile integration, etc...)
This idea will remain open for further exploration and input from the Skyward Community.
Thank you!
Erik O.
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesLora Holman
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
It's great to see so many vote on this idea!
We are researching the idea.
In the meantime, this idea will remain open for continued voting and commenting by the Skyward User Community.
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
We would like to see more support from the Skyward user community. We’d like to see user collaboration prior to considering it for development.
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We need your feedback:
Could you provide a screenshot of what they have set up for parameters? Location: HR\PA\CP\TT.
We’d specifically like to know what you have selected under Timesheet Statuses to include:
Do you have the fourth option “Include timesheets that have no transactions” checked? If it is checked it will make it so the report is wide open.
If you are running it wide open, what are your dates?
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
We would like to see more support from the Skyward user community. We’d like to see user collaboration prior to considering it for development.
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Thank you to those of you in the Skyward community who responded to the call for feedback. Your feedback and additional details provided are helpful to use while researching this request. We will continue to research the ability to make this update in PaC.
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We'd love to see more support from the Skyward User Community prior to considering it for development.
This idea will remain open for continued voting and commenting.
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
We’d like to better understand this request. Can you tell us more about how the current selection parameters on the mass change utility is not meeting your needs in PaC?
Related question/ try this instead: Are you using Employee Management at your district? If so, you can run the Additional Pay Code Mass Add Utility to add the severance code to the Employee Assignments using a Processing List. Then, when you run the Assignment Export /Payroll Import, the Employee Pay Records will be updated.
Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Lora Holman
commented
I agree that this would be very helpful. On PaC, within Payroll, Mass Process, Pay Records, Add the selection parameters allow for building, check loc or employee type. Many times we want to add a new pay code to a large group of people and they don't fit within those options. Processing Lists are a massive time saver.
We have employee management but when we want to mass add a new supplementary pay code we would not want to add this to the assignment and export/import.
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for submitting this Product Idea.
Can you help me understand this idea better?
Which specific fields from Position Control would you expect to pull in Data Mining?
Are there differences in the fields you would expect depending on whether you come from Employee Management or from Salary Negotiations?
Thank you!
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for submitting the product idea!
For clarification, are you referring to the org chart itself or within Employee Profile tabs?
Thank you for your additional input!
Erik O.
Lora Holman
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesLora Holman
supported this idea
·
1. While setting the default to not update all assignments is preferred, I could see the benefit to allowing user preferences to be set.
2. I would like to see this for any change made in Position Control.