Susan Stoffel
My feedback
25 results found
-
11 votes
Hello!
We have a few options that you can try to resolve some of these scenarios you have listed.
We cannot prohibit employees from submitting timesheets before all hours are accounted for, but you can set a requirement for the employee to select a reason why their timesheet is short on hours when the timesheet is at least X less than their weekly schedule time.
For your approvers, there is a setting where you can display timesheets in a different color when they are under a certain # of hours of their schedule.
If your employees have an annualized rule, you could have a time off record created for any hours you are short.
Thank you,
Caitlin Barton
Product Manager
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We'd like to see more support for this idea from the Skyward User Community prior to considering it for development.
This idea will remain open for continued voting and commenting.
In the meantime, we suggest clicking "Report" to preview the mass assignment changes in the report first, and then clicking "Run" to commit changes. There will be a pop-up once you hit "Run" that says "Are you sure you want to Mass Assign the following work schedule for MM/DD/YYYY to MM/DD/YYYY to the selected employees?"
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for submitting this Product Idea.
We suggest submitting a Service Call so one of our Customer Success Representatives can assist you with setup. Our system should already be able to read paid holidays and non-scheduled days (or non-work days) from the same calendar.
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesSusan Stoffel
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We’d love to see more support from the Skyward user community prior to considering it for development.
This idea will remain open for continued voting and comments by the Skyward user community to show their support.
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
We’re looking into this idea with our State and Federal Compliance group.
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
We suggest using the Pay Record Audit, which can inactivate pay records that do not fall in line with an entered control date. To access the Pay Record Audit, navigate to PaC, Human Resources, Payroll, Utilities, and Pay Record Audit.
Skydoc is available at: https://support.skyward.com/DeptDocs/Corporate/Documentation/Public%20Website/Tutorials/Software/HR_PA_UT_PA_AU_PR_548071_120_220_T.pdf
If additional assistance is needed, please submit a Service Call so that one of our Customer Service Representatives can assist you.
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Skyward recommends following these Best Practices published in March and April for dealing with COVID related items including pay:
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
shared this idea
·
-
20 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Thank you for submitting this request. We’ve researched implementing the request based on the information supplied. Going forward, we are not considering this request for development.
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Thank you for submitting and voting on this idea. We suggest that you try this instead:
Create a Custom Form for Note by individual. If you make it as a multi form, you could add more as needed for history or you could use a single form and remove after they have updated what they needed. You are able to include an “Implementation Date” (WH\EP\PS\CF\CF\MS)
Next, create a Data Mining Report. You will be able to run the report by “Implementation Date” and see the notes associated.
Thank you,
Ashley Prinsen
Product OwnerSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We need your feedback!
Could you detail which fields specifically you’d expect to see on the browse?
Would up to 4 accounts be adequate, or would you expect to see more than 4 accounts?
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
We currently have the Transaction Pay Code in Payroll Worksheet which can be used to add a description why an employee is getting paid. Currently, what happens is when you select the Worksheet Detail record into Payroll, it pulls all the deductions/benefits from the Pay Record Pay Code, then renames the Pay Code to the Transaction Pay Code. When it comes through on the check, it’s the Transaction Pay Code, but everything is pulled from the Pay Record with the Pay Record Pay Code. Our suggestion is to create Transaction Pay Codes, but you won’t need to create pay records with them. By doing it this way, you’ll also create consistency between the different records vs a free form description box. This way will also handle any concerns about combining worksheet detail records into payroll transactions.
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We’ve completed research and team analysis. We’ve decided not to pursue this request in the near future because of the data integrity ramifications of deleting historical records.
This Idea will remain available for continued voting and commenting.
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Starting with the 05.20.02.00.11 & 05.20.06.00.02 addendums both available on 6/25/2020 a new option will be available to populate the IRS Form 941 with data from the 941 Report/Extract. Presently, this is only available for the current (2020) form year.
Thank you!
Susan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesSusan Stoffel
supported this idea
·
