Teresa Simpson
My feedback
28 results found
-
7 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
We are evaluating it and would like to see more support from the Skyward user community prior to considering it for development.
This idea remains open for continued skyward user community comment and support.
Teresa Simpson supported this idea · -
10 votesTeresa Simpson supported this idea ·
-
5 votesTeresa Simpson supported this idea ·
-
7 votesTeresa Simpson supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. We’d love to see more support from the Skyward user community prior to considering it for development.
Thank you!
Teresa Simpson supported this idea · -
19 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea. It’s great to see other Skyward users voting on it already!
We’d love to see more support from the Skyward user community prior to considering it for development.
Thank you!
Teresa Simpson supported this idea · -
3 votes
Thank you for submitting this idea.
We’d love to see more support from the Skyward user community before considering it for development.
Thank you!
Teresa Simpson supported this idea · -
105 votes
Thank you for submitting and voting on this Idea. We’ve spent some time here at Skyward doing research for this request and have determined after a thorough analysis that we will not be pursing this development.
We discovered, that if we add multiple buildings to the employee profile, this change would create large ramifications. Building is found in many places throughout the system and the effort, impact and risk to update is not something we will be able to address at this time.
We recommend using Employee Management Data Mining to report on Employees and all their Assigned Buildings.
In Data Mining use Assignment as the Driver Table, In Field Areas select Position, and under Position select Position Building Code, Position Building state, and Position Building Desc. To report on all buildings associated with an Employee.
Thank you!
Teresa Simpson supported this idea ·